Claims vs Facts
The proposal is being sold with parks, childcare, sport, public space and a shuttle bus. Residents should ask the real question: why should any of that require two 50-storey towers and 1,200 dwellings?
Last updated · 7 July 2026
“The shuttle helps transport.”
A private shuttle is not real transport infrastructure. It can be limited, changed, overcrowded or stopped. It does not replace permanent, high-capacity public transport.
How long is the shuttle legally guaranteed, who pays for it, and what happens when demand exceeds capacity?
Source: Billbergia public material / NSW Planning Portal
Add this to my email →“The project includes childcare.”
A childcare centre does not offset 1,200 dwellings. Families need schools, open space, safe streets, medical access, transport and social infrastructure — not one benefit used to justify a massive tower uplift.
How many new families will this proposal add, and does the childcare capacity actually match that demand?
Source: DPHI submissions report
Add this to my email →“This project delivers a park.”
A park is not a blank cheque. Wentworth Point should not have to accept 1,200 dwellings and two 50-storey towers just to receive open space that the suburb already needs.
Is the park truly a public benefit — or is it being used to make an extreme uplift look acceptable?
Source: NSW Planning Portal / scoping material
Add this to my email →“Sydney needs housing.”
Sydney needing housing does not mean Wentworth Point should accept any scale, anywhere, under any process. Housing targets are not a licence to overload one of Sydney's densest suburbs.
Why is Wentworth Point being asked to absorb this scale without infrastructure first?
Source: NSW Planning Portal
Add this to my email →“The community supports it.”
Developer-led promotion is not community consent. Information sessions, calls and glossy benefit lists are not the same as formal public exhibition through the NSW Planning Portal.
Will Billbergia publish exactly who supports the current 1,200-dwelling proposal, how they were contacted, what they were told, and whether they were shown the full history?
Source: DPHI submissions report
Add this to my email →“The VPA guarantees everything residents need.”
A Voluntary Planning Agreement is only as strong as its drafting. Residents have raised concerns about timing of delivery, enforceability, public access, and what happens if items are later renegotiated.
Will the VPA be published in full and put on public exhibition before any approval?
Source: Council records / NSW Planning Portal
Add this to my email →“The project is already approved.”
No. The project is in the SSD process and is currently at Prepare EIS stage. Final development approval has not happened. Anyone presenting it as already approved is misrepresenting the public record.
Will you confirm in writing that no final approval has been granted for SSD-99885210?
Source: NSW Major Projects portal
Add this to my email →