Developer material records what Billbergia is promoting. It does not independently verify the proposal’s impacts, prove community support, guarantee the advertised benefits or mean the development has been approved. Artist impressions are marketing images, not approved plans. Official status and documents should be checked through the NSW Planning Portal.
They sell
“The shuttle helps transport.”
Reality
A private shuttle is not real transport infrastructure. It can be limited, changed, overcrowded or stopped. It does not replace permanent, high-capacity public transport.
Question residents should ask
How long is the shuttle legally guaranteed, who pays for it, and what happens when demand exceeds capacity?
Source: Billbergia public material / NSW Planning Portal
Add this to my email →They sell
“The project includes childcare.”
Reality
A childcare centre does not offset 1,200 dwellings. Families need schools, open space, safe streets, medical access, transport and social infrastructure — not one benefit used to justify a massive tower uplift.
Question residents should ask
How many new families will this proposal add, and does the childcare capacity actually match that demand?
Source: DPHI submissions report
Add this to my email →They sell
“This project delivers a park.”
Reality
A park is not a blank cheque. Wentworth Point should not have to accept 1,200 dwellings and two 50-storey towers just to receive open space that the suburb already needs.
Question residents should ask
Is the park truly a public benefit — or is it being used to make an extreme uplift look acceptable?
Source: NSW Planning Portal / scoping material
Add this to my email →They sell
“Sydney needs housing.”
Reality
Sydney needing housing does not mean Wentworth Point should accept any scale, anywhere, under any process. Housing targets are not a licence to overload one of Sydney's densest suburbs.
Question residents should ask
Why is Wentworth Point being asked to absorb this scale without infrastructure first?
Source: NSW Planning Portal
Add this to my email →They sell
“The community supports it.”
Reality
Developer consultation is not community consent. The 27 June and 2 July 2026 information sessions, calls, flyers and glossy benefit lists were developer-led marketing — not the formal public exhibition through the NSW Planning Portal — and they do not prove residents support the proposal or that claimed benefits are approved, funded or legally guaranteed.
Question residents should ask
Will Billbergia publish exactly who supports the current 1,200-dwelling proposal, how they were contacted, what they were told, and whether they were shown the full history?
Source: DPHI submissions report
Add this to my email →They sell
“The VPA guarantees everything residents need.”
Reality
A Voluntary Planning Agreement is only as strong as its drafting. Residents have raised concerns about timing of delivery, enforceability, public access, and what happens if items are later renegotiated.
Question residents should ask
Will the VPA be published in full and put on public exhibition before any approval?
Source: Council records / NSW Planning Portal
Add this to my email →They sell
“The project is already approved.”
Reality
No. The project is in the SSD process and is currently at Prepare EIS stage. Final development approval has not happened. Anyone presenting it as already approved is misrepresenting the public record.
Question residents should ask
Will you confirm in writing that no final approval has been granted for SSD-99885210?
Source: NSW Major Projects portal
Add this to my email →